Wet Clothes Material Test: Does cotton, silk, linen, or polyester Change How See-Through Wet Clothing Looks?

Wet Clothes Material Test: Does cotton, silk, linen, or polyester Change How See-Through Wet Clothing Looks?

Key Takeaways

  • Simply adding the wet keyword produces stable see-through effects across all materials. All 4 wet conditions achieved 3/3 see-through reproduction. Regardless of material, the wet keyword’s see-through triggering power is high.
  • Transparency differences between materials are small, but texture and garment shape differences are significant. Cotton maintains a crew-neck t-shirt shape, silk transforms into a buttoned blouse with added sheen, and linen reproduces a coarse weave texture.
  • Silk specification changes garment shape the most dramatically. Even when specifying t-shirt, it tends to transform into a blouse (collared, front-button) in 3/3 results. The characteristic thin, glossy fabric feel stands out.
  • Cotton reproduces the most authentic wet t-shirt look. It maintains the crew-neck, short-sleeve t-shirt shape while the fabric clings to the skin showing underwear through the material. If you want a faithful “wet white t-shirt,” cotton is the right choice.
  • Linen has the strongest fabric presence. The coarse weave texture is reproduced, and even when see-through, the fabric quality remains visible.

Experiment Design

ParameterValue
Modelz-image-turbo (6B, photorealistic distilled)
Steps8
CFG1.0
Size1024x1024
Seeds3 fixed (shared across all conditions)
Framingupper body
Per condition3 images (3 seeds)
Total5 conditions x 3 = 15 images

Base Prompt

Base Prompt
1girl, 32yo japanese actress, wearing {CONDITION}, standing, facing camera, upper body, simple white background, soft studio lighting

The {CONDITION} portion is replaced with the following 5 patterns:

ConditionCONDITION
A00: Controlwhite t-shirt
A01: wet cottonwet white cotton t-shirt
A02: wet silkwet white silk blouse
A03: wet linenwet white linen shirt
A04: wet polyesterwet white polyester shirt

Evaluation Criteria

The following visual attributes were observed and recorded:

  • Transparency: How much underwear and skin show through (opaque / semi-transparent / transparent)
  • Garment shape: How material specification affects silhouette and details (collar, buttons, sleeves)
  • Texture: Whether material-specific textures (sheen, weave, surface smoothness) are reproduced
  • Wet expression: Water droplets, skin-clinging, wet hair

Testing Each Condition

A00: Control (Dry White T-Shirt)

Prompt
1girl, 32yo japanese actress, wearing white t-shirt, standing, facing camera, upper body, simple white background, soft studio lighting
seed 1seed 2seed 3
control s1control s2control s3

Observations: 3/3 wearing a white t-shirt, opaque with no see-through. Seed 1 produced a two-person composition within the frame (a seed characteristic that appears in subsequent conditions as well). Seed 2 is the most stable single-person white t-shirt composition. Seed 3 had a butterfly decorative pattern in the background. The crew-neck, short-sleeve t-shirt shape was reproduced in 2/3.

A01: wet white cotton t-shirt

Prompt
1girl, 32yo japanese actress, wearing wet white cotton t-shirt, standing, facing camera, upper body, simple white background, soft studio lighting
NSFW - クリックで表示
seed 1seed 2seed 3
wet cotton s1wet cotton s2wet cotton s3

Observations: 3/3 showed the t-shirt becoming see-through with the bra visible underneath. The crew-neck, short-sleeve t-shirt shape is maintained, and as a cotton effect, the casual t-shirt feel is preserved. The wet specification also makes the hair wet and water droplets appear on the skin. Seed 2 has the highest transparency, with the fabric clinging to the skin and the underwear outline clearly visible. Seed 3 has slightly lower transparency, but this may be influenced by the tighter framing reducing the chest area coverage.

A02: wet white silk blouse

Prompt
1girl, 32yo japanese actress, wearing wet white silk blouse, standing, facing camera, upper body, simple white background, soft studio lighting
NSFW - クリックで表示
seed 1seed 2seed 3
wet silk s1wet silk s2wet silk s3

Observations: 3/3 showed see-through effects. The most notable change was the garment shape transforming from t-shirt to blouse. The silk blouse specification generated a collared, front-button, long-sleeve blouse in 3/3. A silk-like sheen was added, with light reflections visible on the fabric surface. Seed 2 has the highest transparency, with fabric clinging to the skin and clear underwear outline. Seed 3 has an open chest area, with exposure coming more from the opening than the see-through effect.

A03: wet white linen shirt

Prompt
1girl, 32yo japanese actress, wearing wet white linen shirt, standing, facing camera, upper body, simple white background, soft studio lighting
NSFW - クリックで表示
seed 1seed 2seed 3
wet linen s1wet linen s2wet linen s3

Observations: 3/3 showed see-through effects. The distinctive linen characteristic of coarse weave texture was reproduced, with roughness and horizontal/vertical thread patterns visible on the fabric surface. Seeds 1 and 2 show underwear through the material, but compared to cotton and silk, the fabric presence is stronger — an expression of “see-through but still very much fabric.” Seed 2 had curtains appearing in the background. Seed 3 has reduced transparency with an open chest area.

A04: wet white polyester shirt

Prompt
1girl, 32yo japanese actress, wearing wet white polyester shirt, standing, facing camera, upper body, simple white background, soft studio lighting
NSFW - クリックで表示
seed 1seed 2seed 3
wet polyester s1wet polyester s2wet polyester s3

Observations: 3/3 showed see-through effects. The polyester specification generated collared shirts, with a surface that’s not as glossy as silk but smoother than linen. Seeds 1 and 2 show underwear through the fabric, but seed 3 has weak transparency with the chest mostly covered by clothing. Overall, the visual difference between silk blouse and polyester shirt is small — the material-level distinction between these two is smaller than between silk-cotton or linen-cotton.

Material Comparison Summary

MaterialSee-Through RateGarment ShapeTexture CharacteristicsWet Expression
Control (dry)0/3Crew-neck t-shirtOpaque, matte fabricNone
cotton3/3Crew-neck t-shirtCasual, skin-clingingHair and skin also get wet
silk3/3Collared blouseGlossy, thinHair and skin also get wet
linen3/3Collared shirtCoarse weave, strong fabric presenceHair and skin also get wet
polyester3/3Collared shirtSmooth, close to silkHair and skin also get wet

Practical Tips

  • Want a “wet white t-shirt” lookwet white cotton t-shirt. The only option that maintains the t-shirt shape while becoming see-through.
  • Want elegant wet see-throughwet white silk blouse. A glossy blouse that’s see-through yet sophisticated.
  • Want to retain fabric texturewet white linen shirt. The weave shows through even when see-through, creating a strong “through-the-fabric” feel.
  • Want something silk-like but in shirt formwet white polyester shirt. Less glossy than silk but smooth.

Notes

  • The wet specification makes not just clothing but hair wet too. If you want only the clothes wet, a different approach is needed (to be tested in the future).
  • Seed 1 produced a two-person split composition across all conditions. This is a seed characteristic unrelated to material.
  • Material names implicitly change the garment type as well. There’s a tendency for cotton = t-shirt, silk = blouse — material and garment shape are interpreted as a set.