Conclusion First
pantiesdoesn’t guarantee only panties — 1 of 3 images was a T-shirt + panties only, but the other 2 generated a bra and panties setunderwearproduced a bra + panties set in all 3 images —underwearis the most stable choice for reliably generating a matching lingerie setlace pantiesclearly reflects lace material — sheer texture and decorative detail was confirmed in all 3 images; material specification works wellcotton pantiesproduces simple, unadorned panties — plain and no-frills look, in contrast to lacethongclearly changes the shape — a high-cut, narrow-strap design appeared in all 3 images, but topwear was unstable and 1 image was topless- Explicitly specifying a top with
thong and [top]stabilizes output — topwear was present in 3/3 images forthong and white tank top,thong and bra, andlace thong and matching lace bra thong and bratends toward a decorative lace lingerie set — even with justbra, decorative lace and side ribbon bras appearedlace thong and matching lace brais prone to additional accessories like garter belts — 2 of 3 images had added straps or garter belts
What This Article Covers
- How panties appearance changes across 5 underwear keywords
- Whether
pantiesvsunderwearaffects the presence or absence of a top - How well material specification (lace / cotton) is reflected
- Whether
thongproduces a distinct shape difference - Whether the
thongtopwear instability issue can be solved by explicitly specifying a top
Experimental Design
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | z-image-turbo |
| Seeds | 42, 123, 789 (same for all conditions) |
| Per condition | 3 images (3 seeds) |
| Total | 8 conditions = 24 images |
| Variable changed | Underwear keyword only (1 variable) |
Base Prompt
Unified with bedroom setting and standing pose; only the underwear keyword is swapped.
Evaluation Criteria
- Panties shape and material texture
- Presence or absence of a top (panties only vs full set)
- Style consistency across 3 images
Results per Condition
A: panties
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: Gray T-shirt + pale pink panties. The top was auto-filled in, so no panties-only output
- seed 123: Navy bra + panties set with lace detail
- seed 789: White bra + panties set with lace detail
A bra was added in 2 of 3 images, resulting in a full lingerie set. panties alone does not guarantee panties-only output. In seed 42, a T-shirt was auto-generated, suggesting the model tends to avoid a bottom-only underwear look.
B: underwear
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: White bra + panties set with lace detail and ribbon
- seed 123: Navy bra + panties set with lace detail
- seed 789: White bra + panties set with lace detail
All 3 images produced a bra + panties top-and-bottom set. underwear is interpreted as “a full set of underwear,” where the bra is intentional rather than auto-filled. underwear is the most reliable choice for consistently generating a matching lingerie look.
C: lace panties
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: White lace bustier (corset-style) + lace panties. The top also matched in lace
- seed 123: Navy lace bra + lace panties. Fine lace pattern well represented
- seed 789: White lace bra + lace panties. Sheer lace material visible
Lace material texture was clearly output in all 3 images. Compared to conditions A and B, sheer texture and floral decorative patterns were distinguishable. In seed 42, a bustier-style top appeared, suggesting that lace influences the overall outfit style as well.
D: cotton panties
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: Gray T-shirt + plain white panties. No decoration, simple
- seed 123: White sports bra + plain white panties. No embellishment
- seed 789: White bra + plain white panties. Simple design
All 3 images produced plain white panties with no decoration. Compared to condition C (lace panties), there was no lace or sheer texture at all — the unadorned cotton feel came through. In seed 42, a T-shirt was auto-filled, matching the same tendency as condition A seed 42.
E: thong
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: Striped crop top + navy thong with side ribbon. Small fabric area, high-cut design
- seed 123: Navy triangle bikini top + navy thong. Looks close to a micro triangle bikini
- seed 789: Topless + navy thong. No top was generated
Thong shape was confirmed in all 3 images. Compared to other conditions, the fabric area is clearly smaller with a consistent high-cut, narrow-strap design. However, the topwear was unstable — seed 42 got a crop top, seed 123 a bikini top, and seed 789 was topless. thong appears to be interpreted in a higher-exposure context, which suppresses top generation.
Experiment 2: Stabilizing Topwear for Thong
Experiment 1 condition E showed that thong alone results in unstable topwear (1 of 3 images topless). Findings from the camisole verification article suggested that “listing all worn items explicitly” is the most stable approach. Here we test whether explicitly specifying a top alongside thong stabilizes top output.
F: thong and white tank top
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: White cropped tank top + white thong. Ribbed knit texture
- seed 123: White tank top + navy thong. Slightly angled pose, tank top clearly output
- seed 789: White tank top + white thong. Front-facing standing pose, cropped tank top
A white tank top was output in all 3 images with no topless results. Compared to condition E (thong alone), explicit top specification worked effectively. Tank top color matched white as prompted in all 3 images. Thong shape maintained the same high-cut, narrow-strap design as condition E.
G: thong and bra
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: Navy lace bra + navy lace thong with side ribbon. Decorative top-and-bottom set
- seed 123: Navy lace bra + navy lace thong. Similar color to condition E seed 123, but bra clearly output
- seed 789: Gray × navy bra with lace trim + matching color thong. Coordinated color scheme
A bra was output in all 3 images with no topless results. Notably, just writing bra produced lace-decorated bras in all 3 images. The thong context appears to pull the bra style toward decorative, more sensual designs. Lace rate is higher compared to condition B (underwear).
H: lace thong and matching lace bra
| seed 42 | seed 123 | seed 789 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Observations:
- seed 42: Light blue lace bra + lace thong + garter belt. The garter belt was not in the prompt but appeared anyway
- seed 123: Navy lace bra + lace thong + strap detail. Additional straps appeared between bra and thong
- seed 789: Black lace bra + lace thong with side ribbon. Sheer lace texture clearly output
Lace bra + lace thong sets were output in all 3 images with no topless results. However, 2 of 3 images (seed 42 and seed 123) included garter belts or straps not specified in the prompt. High-decoration keywords like lace and matching appear to elevate the overall lingerie set’s elaborateness and trigger additional accessories. Colors varied across all 3 (light blue, navy, black) since no color specification was given.
Experiment 2 Summary
| Condition | Topwear Output | Top Type | Extra Accessories |
|---|---|---|---|
| E: thong (Experiment 1) | 2/3 | Varied (crop top / bikini top / none) | None |
| F: thong and white tank top | 3/3 | White tank top (consistent) | None |
| G: thong and bra | 3/3 | Lace bra (decorative) | None |
| H: lace thong and matching lace bra | 3/3 | Lace bra | 2/3 with garter etc. added |
Topwear was stable at 3/3 for all 3 conditions. The thong topwear instability issue is resolved simply by explicitly specifying a top. However, stacking lace keywords as in lace thong and matching lace bra tends to add unintended accessories like garter belts. For simple control, concise specifications like thong and white tank top or thong and bra are more suitable.
Cross-Condition Comparison (Same Seed)
seed 42 (Experiment 1: A–D)
| panties | underwear | lace panties | cotton panties |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
seed 42 (Experiment 1: E + Experiment 2: F–H)
| thong | thong+tank top | thong+bra | lace thong+lace bra |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
seed 123 (Experiment 1: A–D)
| panties | underwear | lace panties | cotton panties |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
seed 123 (Experiment 1: E + Experiment 2: F–H)
| thong | thong+tank top | thong+bra | lace thong+lace bra |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
seed 789 (Experiment 1: A–D)
| panties | underwear | lace panties | cotton panties |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
seed 789 (Experiment 1: E + Experiment 2: F–H)
| thong | thong+tank top | thong+bra | lace thong+lace bra |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Summary
| Condition | Top Tendency | Panties Characteristics | Stability |
|---|---|---|---|
| panties | Bra added in 2/3, T-shirt in 1/3 | Standard bikini cut | Slightly unstable |
| underwear | Bra + panties set in 3/3 | Standard, lace detail | Stable |
| lace panties | Lace top added in 3/3 | Lace material, sheer texture | Stable |
| cotton panties | T-shirt in 1/3, bra in 2/3 | Plain white, no decoration | Slightly unstable |
| thong | Varied topwear (topless in 1/3) | Thong shape, small fabric area | Unstable |
| thong and white tank top | White tank top in 3/3 | Thong shape | Stable |
| thong and bra | Lace bra in 3/3 | Thong shape, lace detail | Stable |
| lace thong and matching lace bra | Lace bra in 3/3 | Lace thong, extra accessories in 2/3 | Slightly unstable |
Usage Guide
- Want a stable matching lingerie set →
underwear - Want lace texture →
lace panties(top will also be lace) - Want simple, everyday underwear →
cotton panties - Want thong + top stably →
thong and white tank toporthong and bra - Want a lace lingerie set →
lace thong and matching lace bra(watch for added accessories like garters) thongalone is not recommended — topwear becomes unstable; always specify a top explicitlypantiesis ambiguous — not guaranteed to be panties-only; use case is unclear
![[Experiment] Panties Type Comparison — 5 Types + Thong Top Stabilization Test](/tips/panties-type-test/C_seed42.webp)























![[Verified] Image Generation Prompt Best Practices](/tips/prompt-best-practices/cover_0_0000_4517457392071889496.webp)



