[Experiment] Camisole Test — Prompt Comparison Across 7 Conditions for a Single Camisole

Conclusions First

• camisole and panties most stably outputs “camisole + underwear.” All 3 images had camisole and panties clearly separated, resulting in the intended outfit composition
• silk camisole stably generates a silk-texture camisole with a slip dress feel. All 3 produced V-neck glossy silk material, the most “camisole-like” appearance
• camisole, bare legs produces full-body shots without bottoms, but outfit interpretation varies. Output was split between romper style, mini slip dress, and camisole + panties
• camisole alone tends toward a camisole + shorts set or bodysuit style. It’s hard to get a pure single camisole
• lace camisole produces output closer to a lace bodysuit/teddy. Full lace with strong see-through, leaning toward lingerie interpretation
• wearing only a camisole tends to shift framing toward the upper body. Rather than conveying the intent of “wearing only a camisole,” it affected composition (upper body crop)
• nude, camisole produces a bodysuit/leotard style, and the “nude + outerwear” pattern doesn’t work for camisoles. This pattern that was effective for bathrobes couldn’t be reproduced for camisoles

Experiment Design

Base Prompt

The {VARIABLE} part is swapped per condition.

Condition List

Evaluation Criteria

• Camisole form (single camisole, set outfit, or bodysuit style)
• Material differences (ribbed, silk, lace)
• Presence of bottoms (shorts or skirt added)
• Impact on framing

Results by Condition

A: camisole

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: Light blue ribbed camisole with matching material shorts. Output as a roomwear set
• seed 123: Gray camisole but full body connected as a bodysuit/leotard. No boundary with bottoms
• seed 789: White/gray ribbed camisole extending to tunic length. One-piece style covering down to mid-thigh

0 out of 3 images produced a “single camisole” output. Large variation between shorts set, bodysuit style, and tunic-length one-piece. camisole alone does not produce stable outfit interpretation.

B: silk camisole

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: Silver-blue silk slip dress style camisole. V-neck, thin straps, above-knee length. Clear glossy silk texture
• seed 123: Silver-blue silk slip dress. Same color family as seed 42, V-neck + thigh length
• seed 789: Champagne gold/pink silk slip dress. Different color from the other 2, but silk luster is common

All 3 stably produced a V-neck + thin straps + silk luster slip dress style camisole. Most natural-looking “camisole” appearance. Length from thigh to above knee, no bottoms generated.

C: lace camisole

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: White/cream full lace camisole. Bodysuit/teddy silhouette with see-through down to the abdomen
• seed 123: Navy full lace camisole. Same bodysuit-style silhouette as seed 42. Strong see-through
• seed 789: White/cream full lace camisole. Slightly longer than seed 42 at thigh length. See-through present

All 3 produced full lace lingerie-style output with see-through. The tendency for lace camisole to be interpreted closer to a lace teddy/bodysuit than a camisole was confirmed. Color varies by seed (2 white, 1 navy).

Lab Director comment: Oh wow, love it. lace camisole becoming practically lingerie — lace just pulls it too hard, but the see-through looks good. If you want partial lace, you’d probably need to write camisole with lace trim or something.

D: wearing only a camisole

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: Beige/cream ribbed camisole. Only showing up to the waist, upper-body centered framing. Cannot confirm presence of bottoms
• seed 123: Gray camisole. Similar bodysuit/leotard-style one-piece silhouette to A’s seed 123
• seed 789: Light blue striped camisole. Upper-body-only framing, bottoms outside the frame

2 out of 3 images had upper-body biased framing (despite standing specification). wearing only a camisole may have been interpreted as “showing a camisole figure” → upper body crop, rather than “wearing only a camisole.” No effect confirmed for removing bottoms.

E: camisole, bare legs

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: Light blue striped camisole. Short, romper/bodysuit silhouette. Legs exposed but looks like one-piece top and bottom
• seed 123: Navy camisole output as mini slip dress style. Lace trim at hem, thigh length. Legs fully exposed
• seed 789: Beige/pink ribbed camisole with visible matching-color panties. bare legs worked, legs exposed in full-body shot

All 3 became full-body shots with exposed legs due to bare legs effect. However, outfit interpretation varied, with output split between romper (seed 42), mini slip dress (seed 123), and camisole + panties (seed 789). bare legs acts to remove bottoms, but the camisole form itself remains unstable.

F: camisole and panties

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: Light blue ribbed camisole + same-color panties. Clear separation of camisole and panties. Upper-body biased framing, but outfit composition is clear
• seed 123: Blue-gray ribbed camisole + same-color panties. Standing before botanical-patterned wallpaper, camisole and panties output together as a set
• seed 789: Gray ribbed camisole + pink/beige panties. Camisole and panties output in different colors, clearly separated as individual items

All 3 had camisole and panties clearly separated. “Camisole + panties” outfit composition is stable, the most as-intended result among the 7 conditions. Material is all ribbed knit type, color varies by seed but shape is stable.

Lab Director comment: This is the most straightforward one, right. Writing everything being worn is ultimately the most reliable. The full-set specification camisole and panties could probably be applied to other clothing too.

G: nude, camisole

Seed 42	Seed 123	Seed 789

Observations

• seed 42: Beige/nude color ribbed camisole. Bodysuit/leotard-style one-piece silhouette, upper-body biased framing. nude may have been interpreted as skin-color (nude color) clothing
• seed 123: Beige camisole output as bodysuit style. Legs visible but continuing from the bodysuit crotch area, different from a single camisole
• seed 789: Beige camisole output as tunic-length mini one-piece style. Covering upper thigh, not a standalone camisole

All 3 became beige/nude color outfits. nude tended to be interpreted as “nude color (skin color)” color specification rather than “draping over bare skin” like a bathrobe. Output became bodysuit style (seeds 42, 123) or mini one-piece style (seed 789), none resulting in a single camisole.

Lab Director comment: With bathrobes, nude worked as “wearing on bare skin,” but with camisoles it gets interpreted as nude color, huh. Hmm, so the meaning of nude changes depending on the usage context of the clothing. Bathrobes have the premise of “wearing on bare skin,” but camisoles don’t, so nude gets absorbed into the color… that’s an interesting finding.

Same-Seed Side-by-Side Comparison

Checking condition-to-condition differences with the same seed side by side.

Seed 42

A: camisole	B: silk camisole	C: lace camisole	D: wearing only a camisole

E: camisole, bare legs	F: camisole and panties	G: nude, camisole

Seed 123

A: camisole	B: silk camisole	C: lace camisole	D: wearing only a camisole

E: camisole, bare legs	F: camisole and panties	G: nude, camisole

Seed 789

A: camisole	B: silk camisole	C: lace camisole	D: wearing only a camisole

E: camisole, bare legs	F: camisole and panties	G: nude, camisole

Comparative Summary

Discussion

Stability of camisole and panties

The most stably as-intended output among 7 conditions was camisole and panties. By explicitly specifying all components of the outfit, the model’s room for interpretation is narrowed. This approach of “writing everything being worn” is likely effective for other clothing specifications too.

Instability of camisole alone

camisole alone causes the model’s interpretation to vary. Output differed across all 3 images — shorts set, bodysuit style, and one-piece style. To stably output a camisole, adding a material specification (silk, lace) or specifying the full outfit composition (camisole and panties) is more controllable.

Effect of Material Specifications

Adding silk stably leads to a slip dress style with luster, while adding lace stably leads to full-lace lingerie style. Notably, the material word also defines the camisole’s “form.”

Effect and Limits of bare legs

Adding bare legs produces a full-body shot with exposed legs, but the camisole’s own form interpretation did not improve. bare legs functions as a compositional instruction to “expose the legs” but does not define the form of the clothing.

Problems with wearing only a camisole

The expression wearing only ~ had a stronger side effect of shifting framing toward the upper body than actually removing bottoms.

Why nude, camisole Doesn’t Work

While nude, bathrobe established “wearing a bathrobe draped over bare skin,” nude was interpreted as nude color (skin tone) for camisoles. Bathrobes have a clear usage context of “wearing over bare skin,” but camisoles lack that context, so the meaning of nude appears to have been absorbed into the clothing’s color.

Summary

For camisole prompt control, the full outfit specification (camisole and panties) produced the most stable results. Material specifications (silk camisole, lace camisole) also stabilize output, but the form changes to slip dress and lingerie styles respectively. bare legs is effective for leg exposure but doesn’t resolve camisole shape variation. wearing only a camisole has a large side effect of framing change, and nude, camisole is interpreted as nude-color clothing, neither achieving the intended result. The approach of “writing everything being worn” is more reliable than trying to remove bottoms or use indirect control through modifier words.